Inconsistent Evidentiary Presentation, Accusations, and Convictions

No one can be officially accused of a crime, if the standing accusation, conviction, or acquittal of another, is for a crime that the first individual could not (if a conviction or accusation) or must (if an acquittal) have committed within the assumption that the second individual committed the crimes of which the second individual has been officially accused, convicted, or acquitted.

No item of evidence or line of argument that has been presented supporting a particular claim or theory, in one or more trials which led to convictions, can be presented in another trial to support a conflicting claim or theory, unless those convictions have been overturned, or reaffirmed with conflicting claims and theories fully reconciled, by the procedures described and mandated in § Effect of New Evidence.

previous section "Automatic Litigation of Biological Crime"

next section "Repeated Trials"

back to index for this chapter ("The Enforcement System")

back to top-level index

Send email to me at

Site Search

This is a preliminary draft. Pending changes are in The To-Do List