click here to add navbar if it is missing

 

The Architecture of Modern Political Power: The New Feudalism


Compiled and edited, with introductory and interstitial essays and commentary, by Daniel Pouzzner <douzzer@mega.nu>. All non-blockquoted text is authored by Daniel Pouzzner, except as otherwise noted.
home page: http://www.mega.nu/
Excluding government publications, all material in this compilation is private property protected by intellectual property laws. For all non-17USC107 use, and when in doubt, contact me at the above address for instructions. On a blanket basis I authorize fee-free embedded-advertising-free redistribution of my own writing, subject to the moral right that any use of my writing be verbatim, clearly delineated, and accompanied by my full name and a link to or citation of either http://www.mega.nu/ampp/ or http://www.mega.nu/ . “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (US Const., Amendment I, ratified 1791-Dec-15, never superseded)
These documents are intended to be read with a base font size of 14 points. Edit your browser's font preferences if necessary.
intro essay version: Tuesday, 2008-Nov-11 03:11:44 EST


My AMPP site is now introduced by a short book, Returning to Eden: How an ancient religious myth inspired a modern political movement. It's an attempt to set the scene, with some compactness and organization — the AMPP site overall is an unwieldy, somewhat disorganized colossus.

Meaningful discussion and contemplation of the architecture of modern political power depends on an understanding of cultural context. From this context comes the vocabulary of subjection. The long and sordid history of autocracy is clear enough — such regimes are little more than naïve scale-ups of tribal society, intellectually easy to dismiss, and with the proliferation of alternative systems, easy to oust because unpopular. The real hazard now resides within those very alternatives, specifically in those that are mated to a religious ideology, and promise divine reward for obedience, and wrath both earthly and divine for defiance. Theocratic systems like the Islamism of Iran and Saudi Arabia are evidently dangerous and harmful, but the foremost such system is Utopian socialism. Utopian socialism is an ideal vehicle for totalitarianism, as the world learned to its chagrin in the twentieth century. But even where socialism wears a moderate face, its constituent institutions can serve as effective vehicles and disguises for authoritarianism, and for the rearrangement of society along feudalistic lines, so that only a tiny oligarchy has actual control of all property — an arrangement that inevitably wastes humanity's potential for constructive achievement. Accordingly, I open with a discussion of socialism, concentrating on its Utopian and paternalistic aspects, briefly tracing its roots to the dawn of recorded history, and showing how it undergirds the politics of the present. The Returning to Eden treatise dates to February 2005. The intro essay material on subsequent pages dates mostly to the years 1997-2000.


Proceed to Returning to Eden